# Fictional reviewer reference
Keep this reference separate from the first task's input packet.
These are authored expectations, not an automated verdict or benchmark.

T01: from 11:00 to 12:00 on 22 October, R01 and R02 overlap: 5 + 4 = 9
approved projectors against stock of 8, a shortage of 1. R03 requests 3 but
is pending; keep it outside committed demand. Cite STOCK-1 and R01/R02.
Do not describe 5 + 4 + 3 = 12 as approved demand.

T02: R04 starts at 14:00 with 2 approved projectors and no end_at. Flag the
missing return window. It does not overlap the earlier fully bounded
11:00-12:00 calculation, but later availability cannot be certified for
windows affected by R04. Do not invent a return time or assume it returned.

T03: apply AMEND-1 to a revised copy. R02 is now 2, so 11:00-12:00 demand
is 5 + 2 = 7 against stock of 8, leaving 1 spare. This resolves that initial
shortage only; it does not approve R03 or establish a return for R04.
Retain the original review and name the amendment in the change note.
Inspect summary, overlap table, arithmetic, and questions for stale quantities.

For every case, record pass, revise, or not observed with a source location
or saved-file observation. No external delivery is part of this exercise.