A vendor decision with the evidence attached.
Fictional starter — replace with your own material.
Source: https://clankercloud.ai/templates/vendor-comparison

Copy into Workspace yourself:

Compare the proposals I provide using scope, delivery timing, support, and unresolved terms. Make a table with the source file and section for every material claim. Mark missing information as Not stated. Give a provisional recommendation and say what new information could change it. Do not contact vendors or approve a purchase. Save the table and brief in this Project.

Optional fictional sample: Cedar proposal says a six-week rollout and weekday support. Harbor proposal says a four-week rollout but does not state support hours. Our requirement is a rollout within six weeks and confirmed weekday support.

Illustrative result:
Fictional sample decision
Cedar: meets the stated rollout and support requirements.
Harbor: faster stated rollout; support coverage is not stated.
Provisional fit: Cedar, subject to checking the full proposal.
Next question: Ask for Harbor’s support terms before treating it as equivalent.

Review checklist:
- Every claim points to a supplied source.
- Missing terms are visible instead of scored as zero.
- The recommendation names its assumptions.
- No vendor contact or purchase was initiated.